"Obama got elected because of the clarity of his campaign and his speeches. But, surprisingly, he’s in some ways an incoherent president. He’s with the banks, he’s against the banks. He’s leaving Afghanistan, he’s staying in Afghanistan. He strains at being a populist, but his head is in the clouds."
How very true. I, for one, was excited to have a president who would be an outstanding communicator, because our last president was so poor in terms of communication skills. But as it turns out, Obama has really not been any better than Bush at communicating to the public who he is and what his presidency is about.
His take on Judge Vaughn Walker's overturning of Prop 8 last week? Nonexistent. In fact, his Justice Department is currently defending the Defense of Marriage Act. A strange choice for a man who, back in 1994, said that he supported same-sex marraige. A decade later, he changed his position to that of a "fierce supporter of domestic-partnership and civil-union laws." Obama told Chicago's Windy City Times that he was "not a supporter of gay marriage as it has been thrown about, primarily just as a strategic issue."
To say it's unclear where he stands on this issue is an understatement. And now he's angry at the left for not supporting him, Dowd explains. I don't know if I would be considered part of the left or not, but my reason for not supporting him is simple: I don't know what he stands for. If his wavering about gay marriage is about wanting to avoid taking a stand on an issue that feels divisive, then let him say that. But he hasn't said that. He's said nothing.
The longer Obama continues to waffle about who he is and what he stands for as president, the more he will continue to alienate both the left and the right. And then no one wins.
Add a comment